We receive numerous questions on the topics of health & the environment. Some of the questions we receive are answered here. If you would like to ask us a question, you may put your question into an email and send it to us. Give us at least one week to respond. We will respond to as many questions as possible.
Thank you,
Jane, Sam & Joanne
1. Why is there a need for this type of charity?
Desperate Cancer patients rarely learn about the majority of available alternative medical options. In fact according to Dr. James P. Carter in his book “Racketeering in Medicine”; a full 80% of those who travel outside the US for alternative cancer treatments are so terribly advanced in their diseases that it is too late, even for alternative approaches. This fact alone obscures the value of these therapies.” In 1987, DeFelice, the Director of the Foundation for Innovative Medicine lamented, ……… “Over the past 20 years, a a pervasive and aggressive regulating system has evolved that has effectively blocked the caring clinical innovator at nearly every step. Let there be no doubt that we have quietly, but effectively, eliminated the Louis Pasteur’s of our great country.”
2. Why is it so difficult to access information regarding Alternative Treatment?
Only 10% of the world’s total biomedical literature is located in the Index Medicus also referred to as the Medline database. Much clinical data supporting other alternative treatments is found only in medical journals not politically or financially dependent on the pharmaceuticals for advertising revenue.
3. Why do you think these more aggressive alternative therapies are kept out of the country?
Organized medicine argues that new treatments are “unproven” because double blind studies have not been performed to prove efficacy beyond doubt.”The double-blind study was developed to prevent bias in agriculture research up in Canada. To test the effects of fertilizer on crop yields, Canadian agriculturalists planted two patches. The experiment was double-blind because neither the harvester who measured the crop nor the researchers knew which patch was fertilized and which one was not, eliminating the element of subjective bias. Double-blind studies were never meant to be used as the sole criterion for determining scientific truth.” (Racketeering In Medicine, James P. Carter, M.D.)
About 80% of all medical procedures now used in the daily practice of medicine have never been proven through such research studies. (i.e., taking your temperature to determine health and/or illness)
